<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Bundling plugins with WordPress themes.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.nicholas-rowe.com/bundling-plugins-with-wordpress-themes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.nicholas-rowe.com/bundling-plugins-with-wordpress-themes/</link>
	<description>CEO &#38; Co-Founder - Saigon Digital</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 03:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Raoul		</title>
		<link>https://www.nicholas-rowe.com/bundling-plugins-with-wordpress-themes/#comment-51</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raoul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicholas-rowe.com/?p=316#comment-51</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Question: if integrating plugins is a bad practice, why did you integrate ACF directly into the theme? TGM is nice for other plugins but what about ACF? There are other options out there for providing meta fields but of course, none as polished as ACF.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question: if integrating plugins is a bad practice, why did you integrate ACF directly into the theme? TGM is nice for other plugins but what about ACF? There are other options out there for providing meta fields but of course, none as polished as ACF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
